Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(6): e071973, 2023 06 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify differences in number and timing of first primary cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair procedures during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021; 2020/2021) compared with the preceding year (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020; 2019/2021). DESIGN: National observational study of administrative hospital data. SETTING: National Health Service hospitals in England. STUDY POPULATION: Children <5 years undergoing primary repair for an orofacial cleft Population Consensus and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures-fourth revisions (OPCS-4) codes F031, F291). MAIN EXPOSURE: Procedure date (2020/2021 vs 2019/2020). MAIN OUTCOMES: Numbers and timing (age in months) of first primary CLP procedures. RESULTS: 1716 CLP primary repair procedures were included in the analysis. In 2020/2021, 774 CLP procedures were carried out compared with 942 in 2019/2020, a reduction of 17.8% (95% CI 9.5% to 25.4%). The reduction varied over time in 2020/2021, with no surgeries at all during the first 2 months (April and May 2020). Compared with 2019/2020, first primary lip repair procedures performed in 2020/2021 were delayed by 1.6 months on average (95% CI 0.9 to 2.2 months). Delays in primary palate repairs were smaller on average but varied across the nine geographical regions. CONCLUSION: There were significant reductions in the number and delays in timing of first primary CLP repair procedures in England during the first year of the pandemic, which may affect long-term outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Pandemics , State Medicine , England/epidemiology
2.
BMC Oral Health ; 23(1): 246, 2023 04 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2302877

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The environmental etiology of non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFCs) is still under research. The aim of this case-control study is to assess COVID-19 associated factors that may be related to the risk of NSOFC in five Arab countries. These factors include COVID-19 infection, COVID-19 symptoms, family member or friends infected with COVID-19, stress, smoking, socioeconomic status and fear of COVID-19. METHODS: The study took place in governmental hospitals in five Arab countries from November 2020 to November 2021. Controls are matched in the month of delivery and site of recruitment. A clinical examination was carried out using LASHAL classification. Maternal exposure to medication, illnesses, supplementation, COVID-19 infection during their pregestation and 1st trimester periods were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Maternal exposure to stress was assessed using the Life Events scale, fear of covid-19 scale, family member or friend affected with covid-19 infection, pregnancy planning and threatened abortion. RESULTS: The study recruited 1135 infants (386 NSOFC and 749 controls). Living in urban areas, maternal exposure to medications 3-months pregestation, maternal exposure to any of the prenatal life events and maternal fear of COVID-19 significantly increased the risk of having a child with NSOFC. On the other hand, mothers exposed to supplementation 3-months pregestation, mothers suspected of having COVID-19 infection, family members or friends testing positive with COVID-19 significantly decreased the risk of having a child with NSOFC. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that NSOFC may be associated with maternal exposure to lifetime stress and COVID-19 fear in particular, with no direct effect of the COVID-19 infection itself. This highlights the importance of providing psychological support for expecting mothers during stressful events that affect populations such as the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to the usual antenatal care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , Case-Control Studies , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mothers , Pandemics , Risk Factors , Middle East/epidemiology , Egypt/epidemiology
3.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 20(1): 154-159, 2022 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1988987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Speech therapy is important for ideal functional outcome after cleft palate surgery. Nationwide lockdown due to outbreak of COVID-19 in Nepal restricted the ability of patients to travel to nearby outreach centers for regular speech therapy. The objectives were to assess the feasibility and challenges of conducting online speech therapy with postpalatoplasty children during COVID-19 pandemic; and evaluate the ways to overcome them. METHODS: Patients with cleft palate surgery done at least 3 months prior were given online speech therapy. Feasibility, advantages and challenges of online speech therapy were evaluated through interviewing the guardians and speech therapy providers. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were included in the study. Only 11.2% had secondary palatine procedures. Almost all the children (97.8%) had face to face speech therapy prior to study period. Best use of time, use of audiovisual aid, no need to travel and rapid progress were the most commonly perceived strengths of online speech therapy. The most frequent challenges were internet connectivity, unclear voice, lack of direct interaction and unstable power supply. Recommended ways to improve online speech therapy were cited as better internet connectivity, having a fixed schedule and availing free or affordable Wifi. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges, online speech therapy provided us with a way to reach out to the cleft palate children when face-to-face therapy was not possible due to COVID-19 pandemic. We see its role even during non-pandemic situations for the children who are unable to visit the speech therapy centers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Palate , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Nepal/epidemiology , Pandemics , Speech Therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ann Glob Health ; 88(1): 9, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1667533

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems worldwide, but while high-income countries (HICs) have been able to adapt, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been much slower to do so due to a lack of funding, skilled healthcare providers, equipment, and facilities. The redistribution of resources to combat the pandemic in LMICs has resulted in decreased surgical volumes at local surgical centers as well as a dramatic reduction in the number of humanitarian aid missions. Despite recent global investment in improving the surgical capacities of LMICs, even in the pre-COVID-19 era there was a vast unmet surgical need. This deficit in surgical capacity has grown during the pandemic and it will be a significant struggle to overcome the resulting backlog of patients. A topic of particular concern to the authors is the effect that the pandemic will have on the delivery of time-sensitive surgical care to patients with cleft palate deformities as delay in providing care can have enormous physical and psychosocial consequences. This paper draws increased attention to the lasting impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on cleft palate patients in LMICs. SSRN Pre-print server link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3898055.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Palate , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Developing Countries , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
5.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(5): 1689-1695, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1540402

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cleft lip and/or palate is the most common craniofacial anomaly and occurs in 1 in 650 to 700 live births in the United Kingdom (UK). The majority of cleft surgery is elective, and as a result, almost all cleft surgery was suspended across the UK in March 2020 during the first national lockdown. The UK has centralised regional Cleft Services which all use the same agreed target-age standards for primary surgery including lip and palate repairs. The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) response has caused a delay in carrying out procedures. The severity of this delay depends on the impact of COVID-19 on local trusts and R-value within that region. As the country goes through the second and third wave, the impact could be long lasting, and we aimed to quantify it so that the data could be used to guide service prioritisation in the NHS and help future workforce planning. METHODS: An online survey was designed based on the cleft quality dashboard indicators and circulated nationally to all nine cleft regions in the UK. The survey was divided into three main headings: • Duration of suspended cleft services • Quantification of the impact on delayed in surgery/services • Changes needed to restart surgery/services RESULTS: We obtained a 60% response rate with five completed surveys from five out of nine regions. All regions reported that they suspended their cleft services in March 2020 around the time of the first wave and the first national lockdown. There has been an impact on delayed surgical and clinical interventions for cleft patients. Regions were affected differently with some on an exponential waiting list growth projection, whereas other teams are on track to recover from the backlog within 7-22 weeks. There has been an impact on the allied health professionals' services within the cleft multidisciplinary team. The cleft nurses' 24-h reviews, Speech And Language Therapy (SALT), and psychology maintained service delivery in some format. Patient-facing services such as audiology and dentistry were significantly disrupted and continue to experience delays due to reduced capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Various regions have seen a varied impact from COVID-19 on their services, from all cleft regions there seems to be an impact on achieving surgery within the national target age. The adverse effect of the COVID-19 impact is unlikely to be known for a few years to come; however, the data are a useful guide when supporting the allocation of resources within the healthcare setting. A prospective long-term study is required to assess the impact of COVID-19 on cleft surgery, follow-up, assess access to allied health professional MDT clinics, and long-term complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Northern Ireland , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 59(5): 675-679, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1273208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As a result of the current global pandemic, the dental profession has utilized teledentistry to reduce footfall in the hospitals and clinics where possible. Pediatric dental consultants form a vital part of a multidisciplinary team and regularly monitor the dental growth and development of patients with cleft lip and palate. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the service provided by pediatric dental consultants in the South Thames Cleft Service at Evelina Children's Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic through virtual clinics. DESIGN: Data were collected retrospectively and include all cleft patients contacted via the virtual clinic during May to July 2020. Patients were prioritized by the Red, Amber, Green (RAG) scale to highlight the urgency of their next face-to-face appointment. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were contacted during this period with a 97% response rate. Patients given a RAG score of GREEN (86%) meant no urgent requirement for a face-to-face consultation and AMBER (8%) patients required treatment that was deemed nonurgent. However, 3% of patients received a RED rating as they required urgent input. CONCLUSION: Through these virtual clinics, the pediatric team was able to reach 208 patients and provided advice and reassurance. The need for face-to-face appointment was eliminated for 11% of patients who were discharged to their local dental practitioners, thereby reducing the risk of spreading COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/therapy , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/therapy , Dentists , Humans , Outpatients , Pandemics , Professional Role , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(2): e223-e226, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1216706

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: As Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been gradually controlled domestically, various industries began to resume production in an orderly way. Attention should be paid to the disease and population characteristics of patients with cleft lip with/without palate during diagnosis and treatment. This article summarized and provided prevention and control recommendations on management strategies during hospitalization and protective measures of patients and healthcare workers, hoping to minimize the spread of disease and create a relatively safe environment for medical work.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , China/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 58(11): 1341-1347, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1112414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: At the declaration of the global pandemic on March 11, 2020, many hospitals and institutions developed a tiered framework for the stratification and prioritization of elective surgery. Cleft lip and palate repair was classified as low acuity, and nasoalveolar molding (NAM) clinics were closed. Anticipating the consequences of delayed cleft care and the additional burden this would cause families, we reassessed our risk-stratification and perioperative algorithms. We hypothesized we could safely optimize nasolabial repair without burdening our care systems and without increasing COVID-19-related morbidity/mortality. METHODS: Our multidisciplinary cleft team reevaluated patient selection to maximize surgical impact. Perioperative protocols were adjusted, and COVID-19 preoperative testing was utilized before nasolabial repair and prior to suture removal under anesthesia. RESULTS: Early in the pandemic, unilateral cleft repair was prioritized and successfully completed on 9 patients. There were no complications related to COVID-19. Nasoalveolar molding clinic was reopened after total patient volume was significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: We offer an approach for surgical management of nasolabial clefts during a global pandemic. Although guidelines have suggested postponing all cleft care, we found that at our dedicated pediatric hospital with low burden of COVID-19 and adequate resources, we could follow a strategy to safely resume cleft care while decreasing burden on our patients' families and care delivery systems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Humans , Nose , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL